Valerie Porter V Shailesh Manjunath [top] Jun 2026

g., contract dispute, property tort, or administrative appeal) that triggered the lawsuit?

On , the Court of Appeals of Georgia issued its decision. Seeking further review, the petitioner moved to escalate the matter to the state's highest court. However, in mid-2021, the Supreme Court of Georgia denied the petition for certiorari under case cross-reference S21C1021 , letting the appellate court’s ruling stand as the final binding judgment. Core Legal Themes and Analysis valerie porter v shailesh manjunath

Discretionary applications are only granted if the appellant demonstrates a significant legal issue or error. The denial suggests the application did not meet these criteria. However, in mid-2021, the Supreme Court of Georgia

Valerie Porter and Shailesh Manjunath were the parents of a minor child. Following their separation, the trial court issued orders regarding custody and child support. Valerie Porter and Shailesh Manjunath were the parents

Following an unfavorable outcome at the trial level, Valerie Porter sought to overturn the decision by filing an with the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Under Georgia law (specifically O.C.G.A. § 5-6-35 ), specific categories of civil actions require this preliminary application process rather than a direct appeal. The Appellate Order

Manjunath’s countersuit (filed pro se initially, then with counsel) alleged that Porter had engaged in and abuse of process . He argued that the "47 files" were standard configuration logs, not trade secrets, and that Porter was using the lawsuit to silence a whistleblower who had reported accounting irregularities in the COO’s department.

: On January 28, 2021, the court issued an order denying Valerie Porter’s Application for Discretionary Appeal. This decision effectively upheld the ruling of the lower trial court (Case Number: 2018CV303190).